book review
The book is an excellent and fun. And l really liked. the main character is crazy, so that is why i said he is schizophrenia.
Character analysis
The bookOne flew over the cuckoo`s nest, narrate a story about some people living in a menal institute. Mc murphy is one of the main character of the novel. Mc murphy is aloud readheaded gambler that does what ever he likes when ever he wantsto. Mr Rachaid is the head nurse in the waid. Mc murphy is kind of the boss of everybody in the ward. M murphy wasn`t happy with way things happened in the ward, so he wanted to make a difference. he tried to and they started to behave like him, wake up late, say i do what ever they felt like change some of the rules. Most of the patients liked him for that. In the begining some of the patients living in the ward thought Mc murphy was kind and thoughtful. They later realized that since Mc murphy came, they have lost alot of money. And also that Mc murphy did most of the things he did becauce he finds itdifficult to obey orders.
Mcmurphy did some stupid things like callenging the head nurse on several occeations during the afrernoon meetings and making fun of her. And he also used lots of curse words on several occations like“Goddammit“. Mc murphy was not actually cazy, he got in to the mental institute because he wanted to had two options go to jail or go to a nuthouse , so he chose the nuthouse. When he found out that the nurse is the one to decide on how long he gets to stay at the nutehouse. He wanted to change his behaviour but he couldn`t.
challenging words
brave=rohkea
basin= lavuaari
fleecy= villainen
chrapper= huussi
vulgar= alatyylinen
scheme= diagrammi
winking= vilkuttaa
pathetic= liikuttava
stunted= kitukasvuinen
encircle= ympäröidä
hostile= vihamielinen
November 22, 2009 at 3:20 pm
I’ll start with the good things in this analysis. You had all the challenging words translated right, and the title was interesting, though, shouldn’t it be schizophrenic instead of schizophrenia? It was also good that you had used the word narrate instead of the usual tell-word. It’s good that you added there a video.
But then to the points that I think need some correcting – and unfortunately I found quite a few of them. I have to say that it was really hard to read the text, because you had misspelled so many words: letters are missing in some words, some sentences are incomprehensible, and you had made mistakes in the grammatical tenses. Maybe you should in the future read the text through a few times when it’s ready, and see if you can find any mistakes. Also because the font of the titles is the same as the other text, it makes the whole a bit obscure.
The analysis was more like a summary of the plot from the character’s point of view, instead of a character analysis. I was missing all the analysing of the character’s nature or development during the story, speculation about his ethics etc. I think your analysis is a bit too short too. And there should be absolutely more quotes, not just one word! It doesn’t help me to understand the character any better, I don’t for example even know, how the author describes him.
The mind map led to some football site, which was far from the subject! And where is bibliography? I really would like to give you some good feedback, but when you’ve done this like with the left hand, I don’t really have any other choice. Maybe you should start doing these school works before the deadline so that your partner could do them on time too, okay?
December 6, 2009 at 1:52 pm
Contents: Good
You have some great ideas, but the structure is all over the place. Next time, try constructing a mind map, it helps!
Media / appearance: Very good
What’s up with the mind map? If you needed help publishing it, you could have asked for it in class
Grammar: Good
- schizophrenic = adj. skitsofreeninen
- IN the nuthouse
An analysis about a book should be written in PRESENT tense. You could have used the proofread option to get rid of all the spelling mistakes!